"Droj" <803### [at] drojde> wrote:

> >
> >   axiom = FX
> >   X -> >[-FX]+FX
> >   angle = 40
> >
> Yes, this was the one. I had to scratch my head more than once when I used it.
> It couldn't be symmetric and an angle of 40 could not be right.
> I usually trust PB a lot but I guess something went wrong during publishing...
>

Have to correct myself.
It took some time to figure out how it works but it is symmetric and the angle
is acceptable, too.
But his rule means branches grow (>) with each iteration instead getting smaller
(<).

Cheers, Droj

Post a reply to this message