|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Bad example, because the science behind musical harmony is reasonably
> well understood. It all boils down to stuff the Pythagoreans already
> knew about, which is all about the frequency ratios.
>
> The only complication is the invention of temperaments, which introduce
> a slight offset to just intonation to get some other benefits of musical
> expression.
Until you get into the really wild stuff of which 432 vs 440 is probably only
the tip of the iceberg. . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rt3EAPDn-Ug
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjR0WpWwLrE
For a flying pirouette into the deep end, clutch your energy crystals and
search: Rosslyn Chapel and you'll land firmly into Giza, Angkor Wat, Hypogeum
territory.
Meanwhile, decades later, millions are still endlessly amused by "more cowbell!"
Post a reply to this message
|
|