|
 |
I reply because it gives me opportunity to write the sentence better.
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 11:41:41 -0400, jr wrote:
>
> > read it. excepting the last paragraph where, arguably, I was "rude",
> > the _whole_ post is about "Chris & Co somehow "owe"" the _user
> > community_, in my opinion, fwiw. yet, you persist in making this a
> > personal thing, about "me".
I ought to have written: ... "Chris & Co somehow "owe"" it to the _user
community_, and to POV-Ray itself, in my ...
> >
> > know what?
> >
> >> ... "*plonk*" ...
>
> Good luck with that.
>
> In the words of Stephen Colbert: I accept your apology.
Wikipedia tells me he's someone in TV. I'm a radio person, don't own, nor
watch, TV. therefore ***whooosh***.
and I apologise to the reader for continuing to carry out this .. spat in
public. netiquette, as I found out reading about message cancellation, requires
both parties to dislike one another in private :-), via email. (while mine is
available, Mr H's is not)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
