Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:47:24 -0400, jr wrote:
>
> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 22 Jul 2020 17:53:30 -0400, jr wrote:
> >>
> >> > read/learned about 'control message'.  thanks.
> >>
> >> I await your apology for insinuating that I lied to you about my role
> >> in the project.
> >
> > it takes two to tango.  you used "*plonk*" in your previous message, (I
> > think) to emphasise the .. finality.  do you want to change your mind?
> > because both of us would need to be willing to .. climb down.  the
> > offer: you stop conducting your, um, witch hunt, and I will keep my
> > tongue in check.
>
> No, you don't get to offer being civil in exchange for anything.  I
> called you out for your blatant rudeness and attitude that you're
> entitled to anything.  That doesn't change.  You were (and are) rude, and
> you are not entitled to anything from anyone here.
>
> And you certainly don't get to hold civility hostage *because* you got
> called out for being rude and acting like you were owed *anything*.
>
> Your insinuation that I was lying about my involvement in the project
> based on your total lack of comprehension as to how NNTP works is
> completely separate from your attitude in this entire discussion, that
> Chris & Co somehow "owe" you something, that you're "entitled" to
> explanations, and your general rudeness.

<http://news.povray.org/web.5efdaf83f0cdacfc4d00143e0%40news.povray.org>

read it.  excepting the last paragraph where, arguably, I was "rude", the
_whole_ post is about "Chris & Co somehow "owe"" the _user community_, in my
opinion, fwiw.  yet, you persist in making this a personal thing, about "me".

know what?

> ... "*plonk*" ...

Post a reply to this message