|
|
hi,
William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> On 6/21/20 5:14 AM, jr wrote:
> > William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> >> ....
> >> Dump the inbuilt benchmark. ...
> >
> > popped into my head this morning. :-) occurs to me that not only is having
> > this benchmark "nice", even if only for own information, it is also, in a sense,
> > a convenient and built-in 'make check' equivalent. so I think that unless
> > there's an explicit 'make check' which exercises the build, the '--benchmark'
> > (too) ought to be kept.
>
> There is today an explicit 'make check' which uses the advanced
> directory biscuit scene(1). I'm thinking about changing 'make check' to
> something much simpler like a sphere on a checkered plane. I don't think
> there is any reason for a more complete scene for the 'make check'
> functionality.
see below.
> The current inbuilt benchmark ... Not sure where written at the moment. ...
/tmp/
> ...
> Aside: The current benchmark scene could be made more representative -
> or perhaps their should be several benchmarks. Last I profiled the
> benchmark was, time wise, 65% or more noise(NG 1) and media.
agree, as long as this, and or the 'make check', utilise a good cross-section of
the functionality, they should that and no more.
regards, jr.
Post a reply to this message
|
|