hi,

"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
> > An amazing image. Improved? My minds eye thinks you've added additional
> > plants & flowers over the version previously posted? I also don't recall
> > being able to see inside the tree's cavity as well - but maybe that's
> > positioning of the image on my low-ish quality monitors.
> >
> > Bill P.
>
> Thanks Bill, your memory/powers of observation are working well. Yes, I rendered
> it at a higher resolution a while back (unfortunately the only POV'ing I have
> done in a long time) and decided to fix a problem Norbert highlighted with the
> original scene by adding some more flowers to the top left of the image.

I cannot remember seeing this image before, but agree with BP, amazing.  the
bark makes me think 'beech'.

(the only niggle (for me :-)), I think the critter should not be .. naked.  a
webbing cum tool belt perhaps)


regards, jr.

Post a reply to this message