William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> What's missing is a way to access the x,y,z vector result of all the
> modifiers a pigment / pattern might employ.

> Then pattern_modifier {} grabs just the result of those
> operations for a given point returning the function/pattern space
> adjusted x,y,z values. The usage is something like:

Yes, this will be very nice indeed.



Just curious:
Being eyeballs-deep in the function code, what do you think the odds are that
there will be functions that can return <x, y, z> vectors for user use, say in
the next year or so?

Post a reply to this message