Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
> Le 19-06-13 à 16:18, Bill Pragnell a écrit :
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> On 12-6-2019 19:05, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> >>> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> >>>> Also, a night scene would be pretty cool.
> >>>
> >>> Aha, yes could be good. I'd need many lights though, which could be problematic.
> >>> Moonlight perhaps.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Instead of lights, you can use finish {emission 1} for the window panes.
> >
> > Yes, and since I've been using UberPOV of late, this is probably the best
> > solution.
> >
>
> Using finish{emission 1} is not limited to UberPOV. It works very well
> in version 3.7+

Yes, but I find decent radiosity results difficult to achieve in base POV-Ray
without very slow renders. I think the slight graininess of Uber is a good
trade-off for speed and zero artefacts!

Post a reply to this message