"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:

> Do you mean that Clipka's observation is already 'included' in that TEXT OBJECT
> matrix in some way? Although I surely don't grasp that, it's quite interesting.

That was my initial thought, based on the briefest of glances.

> And the matrix is used ONLY for the text objects, not for the arrow placement
> (unless all the ingredients in the matrix are also used in another form for the
> arrow?) Sorry if I'm not making clear sense; the whole concept is quite fuzzy to
> me at the moment.

After scrutinizing the code more closely, the unions and indentations had me
confused, and perhaps you're right about that.

> BTW, apologies for not yet commenting on your code analysis; I'm slowly
> digesting it all ;-)

Take your time - and check your email.  ;)

Post a reply to this message