"Cousin Ricky" <rickysttATyahooDOTcom> wrote:

> I explain why I did it the way I did in p.o-c:

Yes, I read that part - no complaints here.
I'm very happy with what you were able to achieve - I read through the code, and
it's pretty impressive.
You still have 1000x times the drive and attention span of most people.

> Rewriting the code to match the reduced formula might give people peace of mind
> that my SDL is correct, but as long as the current version works, there's no
> urgency to mess with it.

"Never worry about theory as long as the machinery does what it's supposed to
do." - Robert A. Heinlein

Again, excellent work - it does exactly what I need it to do.  :)

Post a reply to this message