"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> ....and a different city from a more 'real' viewpoint.

It's looking better and better <*sigh*> You've also solved the need for
'recessed' building sections on top of the 'main' buildings. I still haven't
tackled that (well, with my newer 'buildings as height_field faces' scheme,
anyway.)

Your approach is well worth the effort!

Post a reply to this message