Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:
>
> Using intervals 1 and tripling the samples value would have been much
> faster.
> You ONLY use intervals >1 when using method 1 or 2, never ever with
> method 3 (default).
>
> It probably have taken less than a day using intervals 1 and 10 times as
> many samples.


You are right with the intervals 1 issue.
If it wasn't a Gilles Tran code, i'ld have checked more carefully...

Meanwhile I rendered with intervals 1 and samples 70.
It's not faster, but the result is slightly better.

Norbert

Post a reply to this message