"Thorsten Froehlich" <nomail@nomail> wrote:

> Well, the documentation was actually written as a book, not as a set of bits to
> take and use without the context of the containing sections.

Interesting; I didn't know that. And I see your point; that's why I LOVE books,
rather than reading lengthy stuff on the 'net. I can instantly flip back to
something I read previously, all in context.
>
> Of course, having to infer that a tranform function returns a 3D vector isn't
> all that trivial indeed. Probably instead of "Function splines take..." it
> should read "Function transforms return a three component vector. Function
> splines take..."
>

Yes, that sounds MUCH better!

Post a reply to this message