|
 |
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> Ah, thanks indeed! I was just starting to work on this - from a
> different angle I must confess, but to the same ultimate result. THis
> comes just in time.
Certainly :)
With so many people with so few Round Tuits, it's a lot easier to pitch in
1/4-of-a-Round-Tuit each and get 1 full final result.
I'll see if I can work on this some more - if you have any questions or ideas
for improvements, let me know.
One thing that comes to mind is to use trace() to limit scanning the entire
bounding box, though it seems to go fast enough at the moment.
Maybe that could be a switchable enable/disable feature for when high-density
scanning of sparse objects are used.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
