Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:

>
> Want something even more compact?

Ah, yes indeed, that works as well-- and IS more compact. I'm familiar with
"not", but it would never have occured to me to use it in this context...until
now ;-)

Your example (and your other comments) have helped me to further understand the
nature of my original problem. Very much appreciated.

Post a reply to this message