POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Gem settings: opinions wanted : Re: Gem settings: opinions wanted Server Time
7 Nov 2024 00:20:53 EST (-0500)
  Re: Gem settings: opinions wanted  
From: omniverse
Date: 17 Jun 2017 06:35:00
Message: <web.5945055c8e3982189c5d6c810@news.povray.org>
Cousin Ricky <ric### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
> Round brilliant models are a dime a dozen, but I've never seen settings
> modeled, so I figured I would do it.  I'm satisfied with the prongs, but
> I don't know how these things attach to the ring.  (Web image searches
> haven't helped, because in most of the images, the gem blocked the base
> of the setting, and when this wasn't the case, the setting was way too
> fancy for my goal.)
>
> I have four models for the base of the setting.  Which do you think is
> the best, and do you have any better ideas?

I'll make it more difficult to decide by saying A or D instead of Thomas's B or
C.

I don't know anything about jewelry, especially rings, but I just always thought
diamonds or clear gems were placed onto a setting with a reflective underside.
Looking at pictures of ring settings just now it would seem to prove me mostly
wrong.

Many apparently have open space below the prongs, a hole in the ring itself, at
least for this type of setting. I guess that's to allow more light around it.
Maybe because light doesn't refract down and back up very easily??

Bob


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.