"omniverse" <omn### [at] charternet> wrote:

>
> Gave it a try with good old 3.7, not quite the same. 10, 11 and 12 samples are
> identical. Likewise 20, 21 and 22.

That is indeed odd! But in light of Clipka's analysis, it could be the result of
3.7's possibly mixed-up treatment of intervals, etc. My guess, anyway.

Post a reply to this message