clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 21.03.2017 um 15:12 schrieb William F Pokorny:
>
> > Aside: I thought the second diffuse parameter required a proceeding
> > comma, but if working OK for you must not be the case... :-)
>
> All commas in POV-Ray's scene description language are optional --
> unless the second expression has a leading `+` or `-` sign, which would
> be interpreted as a mathematical operation without a comma; it is
> therefore a good habit to make liberal use of commas.

Thanks. Do you have any suggestions to improve the accuracy of radiosity
simulation? The back side diffuse is well taken into account in Pov-ray? Should
I improve brightness or light intensity?

Post a reply to this message