Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Overall, I think that version 4 is doing a good job and solves the
> problem of version 3. The attached image demonstrates that. Never mind
> the columns for supporting the sky ;-) Those are little troubles at the
> height_field's edges.
>
> --
> Thomas

Nice work, Thomas!

Would you be willing to share some of your eroded landscape height maps?

Post a reply to this message