"Tor Olav Kristensen" <tor### [at] TOBEREMOVEDgmailcom> wrote:
> "John Greenwood" <joh### [at] john-greenwoodcouk> wrote:
> > clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > > Am 01.12.2016 um 11:34 schrieb John Greenwood:

> >
> > Substituting R_function for R_S_function no longer works. I think this is
> > because Fm is a function that contains functions of x,y,z.
>
> This works:
>
> #declare R_Surface =
>   function(p, r, L, xo, yo, zo, x, y, z, Fm) {
>     R_function(
>       p,
>       ((x*xo + y*yo + z*zo)/sqrt(pow(xo,2) + pow(yo,2) + pow(zo,2)) + L + Fm)/-r
>     )
>   }
>
> Fm is not a function, it is a parameter that already contains a value when the
> R_Surface function is evaluated, so x, y and z is not needed within the
> R_Surface function for the purpose of calculating Fm.
>
>
> Btw.:
>
> If you do this:
>
> #include "functions.inc"
>
> Then you can replace this:
>
> sqrt(pow(xo,2) + pow(yo,2) + pow(zo,2))
>
> - with this:
>
> f_r(xo, yo, zo)
>
> --
> Tor Olav
> http://subcube.com

Thanks for showing me this. I need to look at it more closely.

But what about the main question: can my function which, is a single closed
surface, be turned into mesh?

Post a reply to this message