Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> On 11/5/2016 8:38 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> > Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >> On 11/5/2016 7:19 PM, LanuHum wrote:
> >>> Sorry! I am very worried.
> >>
> >> Sorry to hear that.
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>       Stephen
> >
> > But, I'm really worried!
>
> The word you might mean is concerned. :)
>
> > And I really want to put an end to the endless debate.
> > Povray must have GPU.
> > Povray should become a universal tool: best of the best.
> > I love him for endless possibilities.
> > Such opportunities no one else...
> > All of this should be available to all...
> >
> >
>
> This has been asked many times over the years. And always the answer is
> that it is not possible or so hard that it is next to impossible.
> PovRay has to be portable to all OS and hardware.
> I am only a user and cannot comment on the practicability.
> Questions:
> Could you programme to do this for all types of GPUs?
> Could you work with other developers in a professional way to integrate
> it into the project?
>
> It would be great if PovRay could use a GPU but always the answer is
> that it cannot be done.
>
> --
>
> Regards
>      Stephen



Developers I know: clipka and Le Forgeron.
Important for me their opinion,,,
Clipka has uberpov, Gerome has hgpovray
I will take it...

Gerome; - problems: they do not use the C++11
Gerome - au!
you'll be a long time to write in Devanagari???

Post a reply to this message