clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:

> That would imply what I described to William as solution variant (C):
> The parser would first have to...

Very good.  Sorry - it's harder for me to follow these things now that my day is
a lot more fragmented.

> Especially the last step is a non-trivial thing to do,

I would wholeheartedly agree!

> and I guess it
> may be easier to just fix the intersection computation to handle
> "flipped" portions in the shape.

Yes - It certainly seems like you've all got that covered.
Sorry for the complication.   :)

Post a reply to this message