POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Irid vs SSLT redux (with less assumed gamma) : Re: Irid vs SSLT redux (with less assumed gamma) Server Time
6 May 2024 21:35:14 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Irid vs SSLT redux (with less assumed gamma)  
From: Simon J  Cambridge
Date: 2 May 2016 08:55:01
Message: <web.57274da1aca34b78acfa7bc90@news.povray.org>
"Simon J. Cambridge" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> Since I have been told that I am a very naughty boy and must not use
> assumed_gamma 2.2 nor misuse irid in any way shape or form, I have reworked one
> of the images in accordance with this new theology.
>
> Points of note. The meshes need severe sub-division, the more the merrier. I
> also ran the gamut of 20 to 50 mm_per_unit for SSLT and settled on 40. Irid is
> really good at highlighting the normals which SSLT tends to hide.
>
> But ... is this necessarily a good thing?
>
> Simon.
>
> PS. I do have an excuse for 2.2, though! CRTs! And POV-Ray versions 1, 2, 3,
> 3.5, 3.6, 3.62......... And CRT's! Do NOT forget CRT's!

And the second image continuing the theme.

I also changed the lighting so that you can see SSLT occurring in one of the
ears. It is probably manadatory to have SSLT occuring in at least one ear.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'ssltvir02.png' (1159 KB)

Preview of image 'ssltvir02.png'
ssltvir02.png


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.