POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Irid vs SubSurface : Re: Irid vs SubSurface Server Time
4 May 2024 13:49:47 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Irid vs SubSurface  
From: Simon J  Cambridge
Date: 30 Apr 2016 11:10:01
Message: <web.5724ca39c86b25c7240402840@news.povray.org>
"Simon J. Cambridge" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I have been trying for ages to get satisfactory results with subsurface (both
> POV 3.7 and Samuel Benge's fastSSS). I imagine I am doing it wrong in some way
> as I can never get the results that I want! So I got to debating with myself as
> to the whichness of the why and tried using Irid instead. After various tests I
> came up with the following, ramping Irid up (2), using low lighting (fade
> distance) and a small thickness (0.05). The results are as you see (but be
> advised these are all very much works in progress!)
>
> One thing of note. It is very much faster than SubSurface. Also, I was wondering
> whether there was any mileage in being able to use a colour component for the
> strength, eg Irid <1, 0.7, 0.5>.

Number two! Just to add that these images are supposed to be 'portraits' though
I have tried this technique in complex environments as well (halls, rooms, etc).


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'test02.png' (589 KB)

Preview of image 'test02.png'
test02.png


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.