Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
> Hard names aside, might it be more logical to write it like this
>
>    diffuse {<amount> method <bla> roughness <x> ...}
>
> similar to e.g. how reflection or media parameters are grouped.
> Supported parameters depend on the method, and if it makes sense
> to have e.g. a roughness parameter for multiple methods it can
> have different range / interpretation depending on method).
>
> You can also make method name lambert explicit this way except
> method lambert will be default anyway.

I vote this.

Post a reply to this message