Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> Somehow I like this part rendering better than the whole image:
> subpixel detail is nice, but actually seeing all that nice detail is
> better. :)
>
> --
> jaime
Hi Jaime,
I know what you mean :-)
But in order to maximise peak memory I placed more details...
In fact I made a 32.000x18.000 image and scaled it down via Photoshop. For me
this way is more effective than rendering with AA 0.00 +am2 +r4 or so. The parts
are from a 8000x4500 image version.
My hope is to get soon better monitors on the market together with faster
networks - 1920x1080 images have severe quality restraints! ;-)
I remember the old days with 800x600 images...
In the meantime I play with your crystals code to replace the prisms in my image
(I hope they don't rise the memory need).
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'part2.jpg' (700 KB)
Preview of image 'part2.jpg'
|
