|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Mike Horvath <mik### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> On 1/11/2016 10:11 PM, Mike Horvath wrote:
> > I ordered one of these and should get it later this week.
> >
> >
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004EDB1S4?keywords=stereoscope&qid=1452568122&ref_=sr_1_90&sr=8-90
> >
> >
> > Are there tutorials on how set up POV-Ray to make such images? I'm not
> > using the look_at keyword in my camera statement. I am using up, right,
> > and direction instead. How can I compensate for this?
By /adding/ a "look_at" statement? ;)
For starters you might get away ok without look_at.
What you really need to do is translate the camera a bit to the left (for the
left eye) or the right (for the right eye) -- which is actually a deal easier if
you don't use look_at, because with that statement you'd have to compute your
effective left/right axis "manually".
> > Mike
>
> Also, is there a particular angle of view I should be aiming for?
That depends on the (apparent) angle at which the image will be visible using
that contraption.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |