clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 03.01.2016 um 18:18 schrieb Norbert Kern:

> > - subsurface lighting for the owl
>
> Are you sure you mean the owl, not the foreground snow?


oh yes - this is what I meant with the small normals. At certain lighting
situations it fakes a bit SSLT (in combination with area light).
Furthermore there were visible artifacts at the owl even with acceptable
settings (radiosity on samples 50, 200).

Personally I've made good experiences with a JVP approach
(http://www.ignorancia.org/en/index.php?page=a-box-of-oranges). Probably I'll
use this method somewhere in the future as an excellent compromise between speed
and quality.


Norbert

Post a reply to this message