"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> ... to be sure I think I would have to see the
> same scene with each effect applied..
>
> Sean

Meanwhile I did render Capriccio with method 2 and "vertraeumter Fluss" (sorry
for not translating it...) with method 1.

All files to rerender the Capriccio scene and modifications are posted in
povray.binaries.scene-files
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.542d8060714e7e245f44f3a00%40news.povray.org%3E/).

I also (re)posted the original Capriccio scene files from 2003
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.542d85973c52af1d5f44f3a00%40news.povray.org%3E/).

To my slight surprise method 2 works good in both scenes, despite some artefacts
related to using a heightfield with (only) 16 bit depth. A heightfield with 24
bit depth would be perfect.


But judge for yourself.
First here is the Capriccio scene modified with method 2.

Norbert

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'painted_capriccio_2.jpg' (838 KB)

Preview of image 'painted_capriccio_2.jpg'