clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 16.09.2014 22:11, schrieb And wrote
> >
> > Is there any difference between no cache result and typical radiosity even with
> > very small error_bound?
>
> The short answer is "yes".
>
> The somewhat longer answer begins with, "that certainly depends on your
> scene."
>
> One thing that no_cache does is make the scene grainy (but
> "anti-aliasing" mode 3 can be used to good effect to counter this effect
> as much as desired, and I actually like it because it gives the image a
> more lively appearance.)
>
> What you will /not/ have with no_cache is any type of splotchy
> artifacts; for instance, radiosity scenes with small detail on otherwise
> flat surfaces tend to have bright blotches in the crevices, which are
> very difficult to counteract with radiosity settings. Not so with
> no_cache: This rendering mode is true to the smallest detail (provided
> you throw enough computing time at it, otherwise the details may drown
> in random noise).

Oh, thank you. I'm occupied these days. I will post my new renders if I have.

Post a reply to this message