"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "And" <49341109@ntnu.edu.tw> wrote:
> > If photorealistic is important to you, I suggest that researching the knowledge
> > on physical based lighting. It has some concepts.
>
> Can use Uberpov's no cache stochastic rendering.
Is there any difference between no cache result and typical radiosity even with
very small error_bound?
Post a reply to this message
|