Alain <kua### [at] videotronca> wrote:

> > On 29/05/2014 03:15, xslittlegrass wrote:
> >> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> >>> On 24/05/2014 19:32, xslittlegrass wrote:
> >>>> I tried a cubic curve and it does look better. I agree that the
> >>>> "broken" may
> >>>> caused by the data points.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks a lot for your help :)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It is a pleasure. :-D
> >>> I have posted a couple of screenshots in p.b.images along with the lathe
> >>> code I modified, a bit. As an example to show what I did.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>       Stephen
> >>
> >> What is p.b.images?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> xslittlegrass
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Sorry, povray.binaries.images on this newsgroup.
> >
> > http://www.povray.org/resources/newsgroups/
> >
> > ->
> > http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/
> >
> > ->
> >
> >
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C5380fd72%40news.povray.org%3E/
> >
> >
> >
> > If I remember correctly. Bishop3D's trial allows you to save scenes with
> > up to 4 objects. That would allow you to work on a lathe and save it.
> >
> > You would need to install PovRay 3.6 to get an immage but you can
> > inspect the code and copy and past into your 3.7 scene.
> >
>
> Use version 3.7. Version 3.6.x is obsolete.
> Next, it's just a mather of refering the correct path.

Thanks a lot! That's really helpful.

Post a reply to this message