Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
> I don't like it, I love it. It puts the impossible cube I did a while ago way to
shame.

Thanks. Well, an impossible cube is a good start. Hopefully this will inspire
you to try some more impossible scenes. They are fun! :-)

Paolo Gibellini <p.g### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> For impossible engines...
> A fantastic shot!
> ;-)

Thanks!

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > It's indeed far less common than the impossible triangle for example. However,
> > this illusion is not the first of its kind. See for example
> > http://im-possible.info/english/art/computer/ausbourne.html or
> > http://impossible-world.blogspot.nl/2014/03/impossible-cog-wheels.html. The
> > drawings on the latter page actually inspired this one.
>
> I think your version tops it though.

Thanks.

> >> The gear could be the next General Motors' or any steel/mechanic-related
> >> company.
> >
> > It's a question though whether it then represents excellence, or shoddy
> > craftsmenship ;-)
>
> Flexibility. It obviously represents the amalgamation of excellence and
> flexibility.

Ah yes, that sounds better. So maybe it's a suitable logo for an Agile Hardware
company.

> "reasonably well"? You must be an Englishman, as that's typical English
> understatement.

Well, I am not English but did live there for a few years, so I might have
picked it up there.

Cheers,
Erwin

Post a reply to this message