Could someone post their output and maybe I could have a comparison???

Thanks

Samir

Le_Forgeron <lef### [at] freefr> wrote:
> Le 26/07/2013 13:02, James Holsenback a écrit :
> > On 07/26/2013 04:59 AM, sseetal wrote:
> >> :~/code/povray/src/povray-3.7.0.RC7# povray
> >> Illegal instruction (core dumped)
> >
> > I didn't see anything (noticeable) but indeed something isn't right
> > because when I run povray without any command line args I get:
> >
> > Problem with option setting
> > povray
> > No input file provided
> >
> > I'm running a slightly modified (area_light related) pre-release version
> > of v3.7.0
> >
>
> Trying the 3.7RC7 on ubuntu 11.10 with 64 bits system (as the Original
> Poster, it seems), I did not had such problem of Illegal instruction either.
>
> I notice nevertheless that his compiler is 4.6 (mine is 4.6.1).
> From synaptic overview, only 4.6.1 is available with oneiric release, so
> where does that 4.6 comes from ?
>
> What is the output of "file unix/povray" (after "make") ?
> Mine is:
> unix/povray: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (GNU/Linux),
> dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, stripped
>
> (and I did not needed the --with-boost-thread=... option, but it worked
> with it too)
>
>
> Now, Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Oslo) has been upgraded to Ubuntu 12.04LTS
> (Precise Pangolin) and/or 13.04 (Raring Ringtail) (with also 12.10
> Quantal Quetzal), and 11.10 is on the end of life since 9th May 2013.
> (no more maintenance)
>
> I might be mislead, so could the original poster reports the output of
> "lsb_release -a" too ?
>
> --
> Just because nobody complains does not mean all parachutes are perfect.

Post a reply to this message