Christian Froeschlin <chr### [at] chrfrde> wrote:
....
> I don't know about this include, but couldn't you simply render
> one large image and split the result for printing afterwards? Either
> manually or using image processing software such as image magick.

I have done this for sizes up to 3x3 printed pages.
The memory footprint stays the same with each bigger print size, the render
animation just runs longer.

Both work, I would like to have a choice which to choose.

Stephen S

Post a reply to this message