James Holsenback <nom### [at] nonecom> wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 12:43 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> Oh and if you guys haven't already noticed the Reference has undergone a
> bit of a re-organization

Is there a reason for the reorganization?  Usually reference standards try to
preserve their organization and clause numbering where possible to maintain
continuity.  Certainly people using the newest version can use the new reference
and be followed, however, if people are reading back at old postings on various
topics, it can cause some confusion.

-tgq

Post a reply to this message