POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Bug in PovRay 3.7 RC7 ?! : Re: Bug in PovRay 3.7 RC7 ?! Server Time
16 May 2024 02:50:31 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Bug in PovRay 3.7 RC7 ?!  
From: Alex
Date: 25 Feb 2013 16:55:01
Message: <web.512bdda0f3182cf6db8ca50@news.povray.org>
Dave Downing <cis### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:27:12 +0100, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>
> I too am running this on the linux RC7 version to try to narrow down the
> issue. In my case:
>
> CPU: Intel i7-3770K Quad Core Overclocked to 4.5GHz (I love saying that!)
> RAM: 16GB
> OS:  Fedora 18 x86_64
>
>
> > Should I presume +KFI0 +KFF360 +KI0 +KF1 ?
> > (361 frames, initial clock 0, final clock 1) ?
>
> Line 625 is the start of a series of #if's for each frame starting at 1.
> The clock variable is not referred to at all.
>
> I used:
> povray +w1920 +h1080 +KFI1 +KFF360 Scene_def.pov
>
> > (PS: 124 hard-coded paths of include, arghh... <3 I also got a warning
> > on each inc, about a null normal vector)
> > )
>
> I had the same warnings as you.
>
> I did a search and replace to make the path to the include files
> relative, no other changes to the source.
>
> Still running after over 20 hours, but no errors so far.
> 160 frames generated of what looks like to be a wonderful animation.

I'm somewhat having a deadline... would you be able to send me the 360 frames
rendered at 1920 x 1080 (AA 0.3)?

> Is the bug limited to the Windows version?
>
> --
> +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
> Dave Downing,  Somerset U.K.
> No bytes were harmed in the making of this message.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.