|
 |
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
>
> Thumbs up for the 360 degrees. I guess it's simply closer to the visual
> experience of real life.
Interesting. I'm sort of 'stuck on the fence' between the two versions. On the
one hand, I do like the 'liquid-like' blur of the 360-deg version. On the other,
I'm so used to seeing/thinking about/dissecting 'film-like' motion blur that
it's the norm for me. (But I wonder if I'm just *telling myself* that it's
better??)
On my older CRT monitor (with a refresh rate of 85Hz), the 360-deg version takes
on a little bit of the 'look' of live video, rather than film. The 180-degree
version seems to reduce that effect, to my eyes (eyes/brain?)--which I find
rather fascinating in itself.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
