|
 |
"Bill Pragnell" <bil### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>
> Motion blur is (yet) another trick on my to-play-with list...
>
> Bill
My simple averaging method is the 'poor man's way'--it doesn't at all reproduce
the 'photographic film' look of, say, a very bright light smeared across the
frame. In such a case, the smear would be equally bright from beginning to end.
In my case, the darker background of previous/later frames is averaged with each
frame's bright 'static' light pool. The result is a 'different', not
quite-so-bright smear. But it still looks pretty cool.
I think MegaPOV (?) has a built-in motion-blur method (no simple averaging of
frames) that produces a more accurate result.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
