Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> MichaelJF <mi-### [at] t-onlinede> wrote:
> > Yes, warp is right completelly. You can put the inside statement immediately
> > before the closing bracket "}" of the mesh2-definition, the direction itself is
> > not important but the inside_vector must exist.
>
> (One might ask that if the direction is not important, then why it has to
> be specified. The direction is not important only for *closed* meshes. For
> open meshes it makes a huge difference which direction you choose.)
>
> --
>                                                           - Warp

Ah, yes, you are right. But as I understand it so far, open meshes are a problem
even with a proper inside_vector.

Michael

Post a reply to this message