Tim Cook <z99### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> And here's a sized-down version of the current version of the map.
> Turns out an 8192x8192 image isn't something my computer is particularly
> happy about being asked to work with, with multiple layers (even vector)
> in an image editor.
Looks good. Red lines are paved roads, yes?
Is it worth trying to convert this to a vector format, svg or something? This
type of graphic cries out to be in a non-bitmap form.
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
