"Chaanakya" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> "Chaanakya" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > > Am 23.07.2012 22:52, schrieb Chaanakya:
> > > > clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > > >> Am 23.07.2012 21:58, schrieb Chaanakya:
> > > >>> "Chaanakya" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> > > >>>> Hey guys!  I just had a quick question...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I was trying to generate the graph of this function (in Cartesian
coordinates):
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> -z + 1.00003 = (3x^2 + 3y^2)/(200000)
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> However, when I render the following code, nothing shows up except for the
> > > >>>> plane:
> > > >> ...
> > > >>>> isosurface {
> > > >>>>     function {
> > > >>>>       -y - ((3*pow(x,2) + 3*pow(z,2))/(200000)) + 1.00003
> > > >>>>     }
> > > >>>>     // contained_by { box { -2,2 } }
> > > >>>>     pigment {
> > > >>>>       color Red
> > > >>>>     }
> > > >>>> }
> > > >> ...
> > > >>> Even more strangely, when I use the equally valid function
> > > >>>
> > > >>> function {
> > > >>>     y + 3*pow(x,2)/200000 + 3*pow(z,2)/200000 - 1.00003
> > > >>> }
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I get a cube.  I think there's something fundamental about isosurfaces that
I'm
> > > >>> not understanding?  That is, how should I convert the function z =
-3x^2/200000
> > > >>> - 3y^2/200000 + 1.00003 into an isosurface?
> > > >>
> > > >> Do un-comment the "contained_by" line!
> > > >>
> > > >> At x=0,z=0 you have y = 1.00003, which is outside the default
> > > >> contained_by object (box{1,1}), and even at the maximum x and z
> > > >> (x=1,z=1) you have y = 1.00000, which just barely touches the box.
> > > >>
> > > >> I.e. the surface you defined is (for practical purposes) all outside
> > > >> default container; so the inside of the default container is either
> > > >> completely outside the isosurface (first version) so that you don't see
> > > >> anything, or completely inside (second version) so that you simply see
> > > >> the container's shape.
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to figure out exactly what container I should use - if I use box {
> > > > <-1,1,-1>,<1,1.00003,1> } I get nothing (I understand why).  If I use box {
> > > > <-1,0.9,-1>,<1,1.00003,1> } I get a box.  How do I get the elliptic paraboloid
> > > > to show up?
> > >
> > > At the current dimensions, the curvature of the isosurface is simply too
> > > small to be noticeable
> > >
> > > You'll need to use a much larger bounding container (and move back the
> > > camera a whole lot) to see anything. Something like
> > > contained_by{box{-20000,20000}}.
> > >
> > > (BTW your elliptic paraboloid seems pretty circular to me.)
> >
> > I think I figured out another way of doing what I want to do using spheres.  I
> > will try it out and report back.
>
> I'm essentially trying to get a 0.00003 unit chunk out of the top of the sphere.
>  I found an example for the hemisphere and I will try to work with that (I kind
> of get how to do it, but I can't seem to get the chunk I need experimenting with
> the box in the intersection).

I have a problem.  When I cut a chunk out of the sphere, it still has a circular
base.  I would like a square base.  How would I achieve that?

Thank you very much in advance!  (and sorry for spamming the thread like this
:P)

- Chaanakya

Post a reply to this message