Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] povrayorg> wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 09:43 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:

> >> direction<0,0.0,.0>
> >
> > I think you are confusing "direction" with "look_at"... this is a
> > clear case of RTFM (remember that with POV-Ray docs, the "F" in RTFM
> > *always* stands for "fine").
> >
> lol ... nicely put!

No no no gents, I agree that the manual is fine, but this is a case of RTFP,
with P standing for post. my problem lay with the BW rendering, and the weird
results from this particular .pov. My reasons for wanting to render this (too
lazy to read the fine manual) have nothing to do with the results.

Post a reply to this message