POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : SSLT future : Re: SSLT future Server Time
2 Nov 2024 08:23:39 EDT (-0400)
  Re: SSLT future  
From: Robert McGregor
Date: 21 Feb 2011 08:35:00
Message: <web.4d6268c33084c50794d713cc0@news.povray.org>
Stephen <mcavoys_at@aoldotcom> wrote:
> On 20/02/2011 8:16 PM, Robert McGregor wrote:
> > Here are a couple of 10cm-long test rhinos, on left with no SSLT, on right
> > with SSLT base texture and layered texture with pigment at filter 0.6
> > (trying to match a reference photo), no radiosity. Not too bad I guess...
>
> Not too bad at all, at all. I've not thought of layering over SSLT.

Here's what I was using - curious to see what this looks like on your lamp:

// SSLT Units
#declare SSLT_UNIT_CM = 10;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_M  = 10 * 100;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_IN = 10 * 2.54;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_FT = 10 * 2.54 * 12;
#declare SSLT_UNIT_YD = 10 * 2.54 * 12 * 3;

#declare SSLT_Samples = <16, 8>*8;

global_settings {
   assumed_gamma 1
   mm_per_unit SSLT_UNIT_CM*10
   subsurface { samples SSLT_Samples.x, SSLT_Samples.y }
}

#include "rhino.inc"  // the model is 1 POV-unit long

object { Rhino
   texture {
      pigment { rgb 1 transmit 0.1 }
      finish {
         // ivory?
         subsurface { <0.70, 0.72, 0.57>, <0.000314, 0.00049, 0.00067> }
      }
   }
   texture {
      pigment { srgb<235,220,190>/255 filter 0.6 }
      normal { agate 0.1 scale 0.15 }
      finish {
         specular 0.7 roughness 0.01
         reflection { 0.05, 0.95 fresnel } conserve_energy
      }
   }
   interior { ior 1.54 }
}

Cheers,
Rob
-------------------------------------------------
www.McGregorFineArt.com


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.