clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 16.02.2011 14:54, schrieb MrS1203:
>
> > Other ideas to solve this problem with the coincident surfaces?
>
> No. It /is/ a known problem, and the only known solution is to avoid
> coincident surfaces wherever they're visible.
Ok, thank you. Then I have to seperate these surfaces with a "push". Not very
nice but it's bearable.
Post a reply to this message
|