Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> On 19/01/2011 08:47 PM, nemesis wrote:
>
> > Andrew's eyes don't seem to notice any difference
> > between 480p and 1080p
>
> Perhaps you mean 480i?

Yes.

>
> And besides, I didn't say there was *no* difference. I just said the
> difference was rather small. Certainly not worth paying tens of
> thousands of pounds for.

They're now the standard TV sets and you don't pay much more than what you used
to pay for.

> > but I'm sure the bizarrely bigger-than-life
> > smoothness would be difficult to ignore...
>
> Increasing the framerate does sound like one hell of a good idea. On the
> other hand, they'll probably just increase it from 50 Hz to 55 Hz and
> call it "extreme motion" or something. :-P

Nope, it's 120hz and very visible a difference.  Well, at least for people
without blurry eyes who can see a crystal clear increase in quality from 480 to
1080 or even 768...

Post a reply to this message