|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> On 11/12/2010 03:08 PM, Darren New wrote:
> > Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> >> anybody studies them - set theory, number theory, category theory, etc.)
> >
> > Set theory is how you prove arithmetic works. Prove 2+3=5.
>
> I didn't say that set theory is not *important*. I said it is not
> *interesting*. Certainly not to me, anyway. The obvious stuff is
> obvious, and the non-obvious stuff is all tedious riddle-like splitting
> of hairs rather than interesting insights.
>
> Also, several sources state that set theory is the fundamental basis of
> all of modern mathematics, but not one single one makes any attempt to
> explain this sweeping statement. Your assertion that set theory somehow
> has something vaguely to do with arithmetic is typical of this type of
> statement. If there *is* some kind of connection between set theory and
> arithmetic, it is highly non-obvious.
suppose you have a set of 2 things and a set of 3 things. How many things you
have in total? Is that not how you even learn basic arithmetic?
functions? a formula mapping things from a set to things from another set?
yeah, set theory is fucking huge.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |