"Stephen Klebs" <skl### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> I did not intend to raise such a hornet's nest here (maybe I did).
> But the debate is fascinated and it was great to see such life in the forum.

Yes indeed! Fascinating and informative. Your own arguments have been
well-thought-out and presented, and likewise the rebuttals.

In my experience, *whenever* the gamma issue has been raised, it's been a
hornet's nest!! ;-) Yet it's actually quite useful (IMO) to see the topic
discussed again like this, in depth. (I might even say it's the *state of the
art* on the subject.) I think this discussion has cleared up a lot of mystery,
among many of us here. In future, when I see a newsgroup poster asking about
gamma (yet again!), I think I'll refer him to your two posts. Much food for
thought, clearly presented.

CHEERS!
Ken

Post a reply to this message