Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> nemesis <nam### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> > Try sci.astro and have old wolves devour your idea.
>
>   I'm reading some of the latest posts there. Over half of the posts are
> spam (*sigh*, I still remember the time in the mid-90's when there was
> virtually *no* spam in usenet, as incredible as that might sound today)
> and most of the rest seems to consist of pseudoscientists writing miles-long
> essays on their newest fads and denigrating established theories and known
> scientists.
>
>   I'm guessing that if I posted there, nobody would actually answer my
> question and instead I would get a few totally useless "the Big Bang
> theory is BS" replies.

yes, lots of loonies (and spam) there.  Still, those are rapidly torn apart by
actual astrophysicists or wannabes with quite some knowledge.  Some interesting
discussions follow from time to time...

sci.astro is much better than alt.astronomy BTW. ;)

Post a reply to this message