"waggy" <hon### [at] handbasketorg> wrote:

> Two things I like about the resulting list: being able to just type what I think
> should be a color name without having to search a list to get it with a good
> chance of successful parsing, and being confident that most people who see the
> named color in an image will recognize it as the one I intended.

When I saw the xkcd survey results, those two advantages were the first thing
that popped into my head.  It is certainly more comprehensive than colors.inc

Post a reply to this message